GOP Voter ID Bill Stalls in Senate     02/27 06:20

   

   WASHINGTON (AP) -- Election-year legislation to impose strict new 
proof-of-citizenship requirements on voting appears stalled in the Senate, for 
now, despite President Donald Trump's call in his State of the Union speech 
that Republicans in Congress pass the bill "before anything else."

   Trump's push for the bill, backed by House conservatives and his most loyal 
supporters ahead of the midterm elections, has put new pressure on Senate 
Majority Leader John Thune as he tries to navigate an effort from inside and 
outside Congress to bypass normal Senate procedure. Thune has said he supports 
the legislation and that his GOP conference is still discussing how to pass it.

   Senate Republicans "aren't unified on an approach," Thune said on Wednesday 
after Trump's speech.

   In an effort to get around Democratic opposition, Trump and others have 
pushed a so-called "talking filibuster," which would bring the Senate back to 
the days of the movie "Mr. Smith Goes to Washington," when senators talked 
indefinitely to block legislation. Today, the Senate mostly skips the speeches 
and votes to end debate, which takes 60 votes in the Senate where Republicans 
have a 53-47 majority.

   Republicans wouldn't have to change the rules to force a talkathon. They 
could simply keep the Senate open and make Democrats deliver speeches for days 
or weeks to delay taking up the legislation. But Thune would still need enough 
support from his caucus to move forward with that approach, and he said this 
week that "we aren't there yet."

   The tension has put the affable, well-liked Thune in a tough spot with Trump 
and many of his voters who argue that the legislation is necessary for a GOP 
victory in the midterm elections. Trump has already made clear that he will 
blame Democrats, and potentially Thune, if they lose their majorities in 
Congress in November -- even though Republicans won control of Congress and the 
White House in 2024 without the bill's requirements.

   Democrats oppose the bill because "they want to cheat," Trump claimed in his 
speech on Tuesday.

   "We have to stop it, John," Trump said, calling out Thune by name.

   Complicated and risky maneuver

   Trump and his supporters, including Utah Sen. Mike Lee, say the talking 
filibuster would allow them to pass the legislation -- called the Safeguard 
American Voter Eligibility, or SAVE America Act -- without any Democratic 
votes. But the maneuver could end up creating more problems for Republicans.

   Under a talking filibuster, Democrats would have to stay on the floor and 
give speeches for an indefinite amount of time to block the bill. Each senator 
is only allowed two speeches on a particular piece of legislation, so the idea 
is that Democrats would eventually run out of speeches or quit due to 
exhaustion, allowing Republicans to proceed with a simple majority vote.

   "We won't pass the SAVE America Act unless we start by making filibustering 
senators speak," Lee said on social media. "This will take time and effort, but 
we'd be crazy not to give it the effort it deserves."

   The reality on the floor would be more complicated. Democrats would be able 
to throw up procedural roadblocks, including restarting the clock for speeches 
if enough Republicans weren't also present on the floor. That means nearly all 
53 Republicans would need to remain close to the Senate during the filibuster, 
while only one Democrat would have to keep speaking. The process could last for 
weeks, given that there are 47 Democrats in the Senate.

   Even if Republicans managed to break the first filibuster, Democrats could 
then offer an unlimited number of amendments on anything they wish, forcing 
Republicans to take hard votes in an election year and potentially adding some 
of their own priorities to the legislation if they have some bipartisan 
support. Each amendment would bring a new round of speeches as well.

   "We'd have to have 50 to defeat every amendment," Thune said. "And that's 
not a where we are right now."

   Republican concerns

   As Thune has discussed the possibility with his conference in recent weeks, 
some Republicans have expressed worry that the process could lead to rules 
changes that could lead the Senate to "go nuclear" and eventually vote to erode 
the legislative filibuster.

   Most Senate Republicans have said they do not want to lower the 60-vote 
threshold for ending debate on legislation, even though it has been lowered for 
presidential and judicial nominations.

   "I agree with the SAVE Act," Sen. Thom Tillis of North Carolina said after 
Trump's speech. "But I'm not going to nuke the filibuster."

   Sen. John Curtis, R-Utah, said that "the reason or method doesn't matter -- 
it's breaking the filibuster."

   Other Republicans could also block the process. Republican Sen. Lisa 
Murkowski of Alaska has said she opposes the SAVE Act, and Kentucky Sen. Mitch 
McConnell, the former GOP majority leader, has opposed similar legislation in 
the past.

   GOP senators who support the maneuver were also realistic about the 
difficulty of the talking filibuster approach.

   "You'd have to have a deep commitment among almost all of our members," said 
Missouri Sen. Eric Schmitt, who supports it.

   Sen. Rick Scott, R-Fla., called it "hard but doable."

   GOP election strategy

   The voting bill would require Americans to prove they are citizens when they 
register to vote, mostly through a valid U.S. passport or birth certificate. It 
would also require a valid photo identification before voters can cast ballots, 
which some states already demand. The House approved it earlier this month on a 
mostly party-line vote, 218-213.

   Republicans said the legislation is needed to prevent voter fraud, but 
Democrats warn it will disenfranchise millions of Americans by making it harder 
to vote. Voting experts have warned that more than 20 million U.S. citizens of 
voting age do not have proof of their citizenship readily available, and almost 
half of Americans do not have a U.S. passport. Critics also said the bill's 
enactment could cause chaos in this year's elections and confuse voters because 
some of it would take effect immediately.

   Federal law already requires that voters in national elections be U.S. 
citizens, but there's no requirement to provide documentary proof when 
registering, though they do affirm under oath at the risk of prosecution that 
they are eligible.

   Experts said voter fraud is extremely rare, and very few noncitizens ever 
slip through the cracks. About one in 10 Americans doesn't have readily 
available paperwork proving they are citizens.

   The legislation also would require states to share their voter information 
with the Department of Homeland Security as a way to verify the citizenship of 
the names on the voter rolls. That has drawn pushback from elections officials, 
including some Republicans, as potentially intrusive on people's privacy.

   Trump said in his speech on Tuesday that the bill would be "country-saving."

   Echoing his false claims of voter fraud when he lost the 2020 election, 
Trump said that Democrats "want to cheat, they have cheated, and their policy 
is so bad that the only way they can get elected is to cheat."